Sunday 2 May 2010

Gain Ground Income With A Fashion Job


Creative Fashion-Page 5 by AlexLION

page about fashion jobs i like to suggest








Whitney Port warned us that the second season of The City was not just a new chapter, but an evolution — a notch on the other side of the arc of a group of people who don’t have to worry about achieving their own success because it is handed to them in their fortuitous positions as television stars. A series that established itself as “relationship-heavy” and “character-driven,” Whitney said, would take a more sophisticated direction with a more sophisticated directive. Now the show is “focused on our careers, and how we’re going to eventually make it in the fashion industry.” Port indicated she had only seen the season premiere, which held true to her forecast. Last night we watched the girls chase careers instead of boys.



Well, except Roxy, who didn’t have anything to do but follow Whitney around and ask questions that would allow our protagonist to explain the plot to the audience. But Olivia, finally agreeing to put office drama with Erin aside, turned from the path of bitchiness and resentment onto the path of journalism in her new role as an Elle.com reporter. Erin rescinded her ultimatum that she would leave Elle if Olivia wasn’t fired, and continued her career in publicity. But her demeanor made clear that this was only for the sake of the show (as a publicist she knows the value of this exposure, even if by way of Olivia) and that she still hated Olivia’s guts deep down inside.



And Whitney, burgeoning fashion designer with a show rapidly approaching at Bryant Park, continued pursuing her fashion-design dreams. With funding we know not of, she has managed to manufacture a collection and secure a spot to show at Bryant Park — something aspiring designers only dream of! But she knew she would “eventually make it” — she would never face the struggles most 24-year-old fashion designers face, so she can’t show 14-year-old aspiring fashion designers how to overcome those hurdles. But she can show them what it’s like, kind of, when one skips all that crap and just goes straight to the Bryant Park show with major magazine editors and buyers in the front row. We wonder if, when the cameras stop for the day, Whitney just rides home on her unicorn with a flock of fairies. But she is perhaps better at working than dating. And so, on to this week’s lessons!



Lesson 1: Being a good sidekick.

Do: Find a role for yourself and stick to it. When Whitney goes fabric shopping and explains how stressed out she is that she has to show 24 looks but only has 17, and has to cast models and figure out hair and other stuff, Roxy just stands there with a blank expression. Sidekicks either need to be like Watson, and offer pertinent information or life-saving assistance, or like Phoebe from Friends and provide comic relief.

Don’t: Stand around like a dope. Roxy might wear an absurd pair of pants rather than sing “Smelly Cat,” but she has to be and do something to make us feel she’s valuable and worth at least a fraction of our cable bills. Here she wants to be an actress and she’s on TV! Wow us, sister!



Lesson 2: Managing two chicks who don’t get along but have to work together.

Don’t: Let one of them talk back to you. Over to Elle, where Olivia struts to some vampy, girlie, techno pop music, Joe finally berates her for bickering with Erin. He just suffered a fiasco on the Today show thanks to Olivia, and scolds her with curse words and more anger than we’ve ever seen him show. But Olivia retorts, “I do not think it is appropriate for her to speak to me or anyone at this magazine the way she does. It is unacceptable. She is a publicist. I am an editor of a magazine. My job is to put the best accessories in the magazines. Her job is to pitch to the press.” Olivia has been working at Elle for only a few weeks at this point, while Erin has been there for years. A new employee with any common sense would never say such a thing to Joe Zee, but he just kind of sits there and takes it. Also, Dear Olivia: This is fashion, people are mean, so GET OVER IT.

Don’t: Cave and give the problem employee what she wants. Instead of forcing her to do better at her job, Joe just reassigns Olivia to Elle.com. If someone can’t do something as simple as giving him a list of credits for a television appearance, how can he have her do anything other than man the reception desk? If even that? “Be that editor that you tell me that you are,” he tells her. Oh, Joe. This is The City, not The Biggest Loser (well, maybe in a sense).



Lesson 3: Designing a fashion line for your first Bryant Park show.

Do: Put the collection above your personal appearance. When she visits the pattern maker to crack the whip on those deadlines, Whitney is perhaps the most unkempt we’ve ever seen her outside her house. Her hair is in a lopsided bun, and she’s clearly put her line (or something) ahead of her mascara and eyelash curler. She obviously spent hours primping before the show (we saw her up close in person there — not a hair amiss), and hasn’t canceled her facial appointments, but she appears to have priorities some of the time.

Don’t: Make lace leggings from dingy taupe lace that just happens to be lying around. Designer Christopher Kunz of Nicholas K — one label in Whitney’s group show along with Mara Hoffman — cautions Whitney against creating looks just for the sake of creating looks, and putting something sloppy on the runway. Yet when she’s at the pattern maker and finds out her lace leggings didn’t work because the fabric didn’t stretch, she just grabs the nearest role of lace she can find. It looks like a soiled antique tablecloth with some glitter. Roxy, perennial fan of ugly bottoms, offers, “I loooooove those leggings.” Where’s a real editor when you need one?



Lesson 4: Mentoring.

Do: Be kind. Kelly is nice to Whitney throughout the episode, and she’s clearly gone above and beyond to include Whitney’s show with two other established labels who don’t want to — and quite frankly couldn’t — compete with a reality star like Whitney for attention. She seems to genuinely care a lot about Whitney.

Don’t: Scare your charge shitless. Kelly likes showing people she knows stuff. Whitney, who knows nothing, provides a great outlet for her to do that, so it's no wonder she adores her. However, she kept saying awful things to Whitney. At one point she asks Whitney if she’s okay. “Not really,” Whitney says. “Let me tell you something: If this doesn’t go well you could be fucked,” Kelly responds. “It would be crazy if you weren’t terrified.” So encouraging! And last season she said, “If [the show] sucks you’re probably done,” which is obviously not true. Plenty of designers with bad shows go on to show again. Besides, a lot of people like really bad clothes! Yet another reason Whitney is destined not to fail.



Lesson 5: Keeping the girl you don’t get along with in her place.

Do: Try to make nice in a fake way. Joe and Robbie tell Erin she has to make nice with Olivia and get along. So Olivia and Erin arrange to embark on a fresh start over tea. We can tell by her expression that Erin is over it before Olivia even walks in the door. And in the best scene of the episode, hands-down, while Olivia tries to make amends, Erin is looking at her with a face of utter disgust. Maybe she’s one of those people who can’t hide in her facial expression what she’s really thinking, even though she thinks she is. But she looks like she totally resents Olivia for having the time to curl and spray her hair so neatly every morning and apply five layers of foundation. But as Olivia chatters on, the emotions in Erin’s face only deepen, and at the very end of the scene she literally looks like she’s choking back chunks of vomit she would actually love to spew on Olivia. But she doesn’t, because this "make nice" meeting is about appearances, and Erin managed not to die right then and there of laughter or disgust. Bravo.

Do: Dress like you mean business. Erin wore a black leather jacket, the perfect complement to her tough anti-bullshit side.



Lesson 6: Interviewing fashion designers backstage.

Do: Ask interesting questions. Olivia interviews Anna Sui backstage after her show for Elle.com. She opens with “What was your inspiration?” which is a fine warm-up question. But then she asks about the CFDA Lifetime Achievement Award. Okay, that is a great honor, but it is also a boring thing to discuss at any length. A reporter she may not be, but she might do some genius freelance work making video press releases or something.

Don’t: Look smug because you think you didn’t mess up. When a reporter gets a really good interview, they don’t look smug. They keep it cool, walk away, and then freak out outside. If they really get something good, they don’t want any other reporters to know and steal the information from them. Olivia, despite fumbling one of her two snooze-worthy questions, turns around and gloats. Somewhere in the background Erin is rolling her eyes. And for these little moments, Erin, we love you.



Thursday, April 29, 2010


Rubio   [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Unless I've missed something he's said, this doesn't sound off: 




RADIO HOST: Let’s get right to it. Right now, our topic, a lot of callers fired up in support of this new law in Arizona. The crackdown on illegal immigration – where do you stand on it?”


MARCO RUBIO: Well, let’s take a deep breath first and realize where we are. This is inevitable that this was going happen somewhere, particularly in Arizona. I was there about two months ago and the people there are – this is not even an immigration issue to them. This is a law enforcement issue.  You’ve got kidnappings and murders and gang violence pouring over the border in an uncontrolled fashion. The bottom line is the Federal government has completely failed to enforce Federal immigration laws, much less make them stronger and more effective. We have a legal immigration system that doesn’t work. And so it is inevitable that eventually some state was going to take action.


“And I’m not going to sit here and criticize a state that’s taken action, in defense of what they’ve done. I will tell you that I don’t think this is the best way to have handled it. I think the best way for this issue to ultimately be handled is for the Federal government to do its job. And the job of the Federal government is to enforce the immigration laws we have, to make sure that to the extent we have to come up with new technologies, whether it’s border security or a fence or fixing the visa program – that the Federal government can handle that. You know, the Federal government is involved in so many things that are none of its business. This is one the things the Federal government should be involved in. And the fact that it has failed to do it in an effective way has led to this. And we certainly can’t have 50 different immigration policies in 50 different states.


“Now here’s my fear: my fear is that the Obama administration is going to use this as an excuse to go forward with some sort of an amnesty bill. I’ve never supported amnesty. I think amnesty would be terrible for America’s future. Quite frankly, I think amnesty is terrible for legal immigration. If you were to grant amnesty, you will never be able to have a legal immigration system that works in America.


“So my hope is that this will serve as a wake-up call to Washington D.C., that the immigration system that we have is broken, that we must figure out a way to stop the growth of illegal immigration in America, and that we’ve got to come up with a legal immigration process that works so that we don’t have to continue to face these kinds of issues that those people in Arizona are facing right now.”



When I hear Janet Napolitano assure us that the borders are secure, I wonder how she could even know given she has to worry about weather conditions and all the other things that fall under the massive mission of the Department of Homeland Security.

Back to Rubio, I think his original statement was premature, as Ramesh has suggested. He reacted to news coverage and not the bill itself. But I don't think he actually comes out to the Left of John McCain (!), as the current impression is.

Earn Money In Fashion


Part of Fashion Tendance'08 (M) by *Gabisa Motonia

learn more about fashion jobs you can read




I first saw Buke And Gass last summer at Joe’s Pub as part of the Happy Ending Music & Reading Series. They performed some of their songs on a bill where I did a reading about black metal (and, separately, Colin Stetson made his saxophone sound like black metal). I’d never heard them before that — they stood out in the way they conjured these weird, catchy, dense songs on homemade instruments. It was unexpectedly bracing. Lots of momentum. As far as the lingo, the buke is “a self-modified six string baritone ukelele” and the gass is “a guitar-bass hybrid.” They both handle all sorts of foot percussion. The sounds are then filtered and processed, etc. It’s compelling watching them kick and strum on these things, but it was Arone Dyer’s waling, uplifting, melodic voice that left the biggest impression on me. You hear Beth Ditto for a second (one who races/fixes bikes and builds her own instruments, doesn’t hang out at fashion shows), Kathleen Hannah in those Bikini Kill days, Throwing Muses, something else, etc., an overall joy.


Just to make things confusing, Arone’s bandmate’s name is Aron. I caught up with the two for Quit Your Day Job because what they do for work helps make more sense of their music: Aron builds instruments for the Blue Man Group (he invented the Aronophonic) and Arone’s a bike mechanic (who happened to sing on Blue Man Group’s “What Is Rock”). And, of course, they also build their own noisemakers. They’re releasing a full-length on Brassland in late summer/early fall and have a few shows next month opening for Brassland heads (with Alec Hanley Bemis) Aaron and Bryce Dessner’s band.


Aron, drums and gass


STEREOGUM: How did you get hooked up with the Blue Man Group?


ARON SANCHEZ: A friend of mine was a member of the Blue Man Group band when I first moved to NYC, he introduced me to them and I started working and performing in the band for the Chicago and New York productions. After a few years of that I began designing and building instruments for them full-time which lasted about nine years. Since ‘08 I work for them freelance.


STEREOGUM: What’s your background in instrument design?


AS: No formal background really, just something I’ve been doing since childhood. I just have a strong desire to build the instruments I play, it’s more satisfying and I’m able to experiment and discover new sounds and techniques. Actually, I have a strong desire to build almost anything, I’m a total geek that way. I studied art and music in school and I suppose instrument design is a way to straddle the two.


STEREOGUM: That show is basically ongoing… forever? How often do you need to build new instruments? Repair old ones?


AS: For Blue Man it’s pretty sporadic, several times a year. They call me when they’re putting up a new show or when something needs to be replaced. Though I’m about to do some big pieces for a new tour they’re putting up next fall, a few instruments that I’ve built before and some that are new designs.


STEREOGUM: Are you able to introduce you own new designs or are you working off specific prototypes?


AS: Well, back when I was working full-time for them I was able to experiment and come up with new designs all the time. A lot of R&D and problem solving.  Basically they would have a concept or idea for a new instrument or new sound they wanted to create and use and I would go off and try to make it happen somehow. Often times it was for a skit they were performing on The Tonight Show or a video piece or the touring productions. There was also the day to day stuff of building and repairing the stock instruments they use in the shows.


STEREOGUM: So you’re not on call?


AS: Yeah, not on call.  Blue Man work is project by project. Lately I’ve been doing more recording than anything else.


STEREOGUM: How many people work on the instruments? The show’s been long-running … Any elder statesman over there?


AS: Mostly just myself and maybe one or two assistants working on the instruments. We had a workshop in Red Hook Brooklyn where all the props, sets, special effects and costumes were fabricated, about 12 people working in they’re specific areas. The show’s been running since ‘90-91 I think. Some elder statesman there, yes, but mostly just the founders of the company.


STEREOGUM: You also build instruments for your own band.


AS: Yes, I build the instrument I play which is a hybrid between a bass and a guitar, as well as the amplifiers and some effect pedals we use.


STEREOGUM: Do you ever incorporate any Blue Man Group-esque elements for Buke & Gass noisemakers?


AS: Mm, not really, no. Different ball game.


STEREOGUM: How many times have you watched the Blue Man Group’s show?


AS: I can’t say, I performed in the show probably … 300-400 times in the two years I was doing that. Since then I’ve probably only seen it a handful of times.


STEREOGUM: Did Tobias ever have a chance?


AS: Didn’t he?


///


Arone, buke and voice


STEREOGUM: You’re a bike mechanic. Do you work in a shop or on your own?


ARONE DYER: I had managed a shop in Lower East Side for a few years, but recently chose to change that situation … Now I’m more freelance/part-part time at a couple different shops, one where I’m their main wheel builder, the other I’m just wrenching. More hands on, as I prefer.


STEREOGUM: How’d you get started?


AD: About seven or eight years ago I began volunteering at Recycle-a-Bicycle, which was a great source of information and gateway into the good-natured cycling community of NYC. I learned a lot there, moved on to another shop and learned more, moved to another/learned more, etc etc. I wrote a few articles on repair for a magazine a few years back, and since then I’ve tried to avoid being in a cycling spotlight.


STEREOGUM: What’s the most common repair?


AD: Flats.


STEREOGUM: Ever been stumped?


AD: Certainly, but far less as time has gone on. Right now I’m stumped as to why I still haven’t fixed the flat on my bike that’s been sitting in my backyard for a year, I mean … just crazy …  Apparently it’s really common.


STEREOGUM: In your opinion, what’s the ideal city bike?


AD: Something you hate so much you love it, yet wouldn’t mind leaving it behind.


STEREOGUM: Do you belong to any biking activist groups?


AD: No, I’m not terribly activisty in general. I support their causes, some of the time, but I tend to stay away from rallies and I don’t yell at cars anymore.


STEREOGUM: You also build instruments…


AD: Yes, learning more about that each day. I’ve dabbled for years, but now I have more reason to dive into it. I’ve built two amplifiers now, the one I play at our shows and a Fender Champ weber kit. Also, I just finished a nicer playing Buke. It’s far fancier with a radial fretboard and a truss rod in the neck, rather than the old fashioned Frankenbuke-style of stretching a cable from the head-stock to the base of the neck, potentially holding it from warping forward with the tension of the strings. No more entanglement.


STEREOGUM: How do you see your biking and music making overlapping, if at all?


AD: Aah, yes, well … to begin with, I just enjoy doing both things so much that that’s what I make sure to spend my time doing. On top of that, my mechanic work provides me the meager financial abilities and mental respite to survive while I make music … and sometimes it works the other way around. Also, I’ve noticed that singing while riding bike is very similar to playing a show, where I’m moving so much it’s hard to catch my breath at times.


///


Here’s a new one:


  • Buke And Gass – “Medulla Oblongata”Download


You can hear older ones at MySpace. They recently spoke for/played at Radiolab. The instruments are explained. Hookworms are mentioned. The shows:


04/25 – Brooklyn, NY @ Glasslands #

05/05 – London UK @ Electric Ballroom %

05/06 – London UK @ Royal Albert Hall %

05/08 – Berlin Germany @ Huxley’s Neue Welt %

05/09 – Berlin Germany @ Astra %

05/14 – Brooklyn, NY @ Glasslands !!


# w/ Melati Malay, Parlovr, The Luyas

% w/ The National

!! w/ Talk Normal, Asa Ransom, Miniboone









MILWAUKEE — Carlos Delfino scored 22 points with six 3-pointers and the Milwaukee Bucks pulled off their second straight playoff surprise, beating the Atlanta Hawks 111-104 Monday night to draw even in the first-round series.



Brandon Jennings scored 23 points and John Salmons added 22 for the Bucks, who survived a fourth-quarter surge led by Atlanta stars Joe Johnson and Josh Smith. Now the Hawks head home for Game 5, desperately needing a win to stave off a surprising challenge by a team missing its best player, injured center Andrew Bogut.




Johnson scored 29 points, reserve Jamal Crawford had 21, and Smith had 20 points and nine rebounds.



The Bucks finally started getting to the free throw line and the made the most of it, hitting 28 of 32.



Salmons was 10 for 10 from the free throw line.



It was yet another subpar performance away from home for the Hawks, who struggled on the road in the regular season and haven't performed well on the road in recent playoff appearances. Atlanta beat Milwaukee in convincing fashion the first two games of the series, but the Bucks blew out the Hawks in Saturday's Game 3.



Atlanta did a better job responding to adversity Monday, but still not good enough.



Delfino went 6 for 8 from 3-point range, including a 3-pointer from the corner to put Milwaukee ahead 97-88 with 3:56 left. Smith missed inside and Jennings grabbed the rebound, then hit a floating jumper at the other end.



Layups by Al Horford and Johnson later cut the lead to five with 1:41 remaining, but Milwaukee's Kurt Thomas made one of two free throws, then took a charge by Crawford with 1:20 left.



Pull In A Fashion Job


page from 1938 fashion catalogue by juffrouwjo

some fashion jobs i found in google








MILWAUKEE — Carlos Delfino scored 22 points with six 3-pointers and the Milwaukee Bucks pulled off their second straight playoff surprise, beating the Atlanta Hawks 111-104 Monday night to draw even in the first-round series.



Brandon Jennings scored 23 points and John Salmons added 22 for the Bucks, who survived a fourth-quarter surge led by Atlanta stars Joe Johnson and Josh Smith. Now the Hawks head home for Game 5, desperately needing a win to stave off a surprising challenge by a team missing its best player, injured center Andrew Bogut.




Johnson scored 29 points, reserve Jamal Crawford had 21, and Smith had 20 points and nine rebounds.



The Bucks finally started getting to the free throw line and the made the most of it, hitting 28 of 32.



Salmons was 10 for 10 from the free throw line.



It was yet another subpar performance away from home for the Hawks, who struggled on the road in the regular season and haven't performed well on the road in recent playoff appearances. Atlanta beat Milwaukee in convincing fashion the first two games of the series, but the Bucks blew out the Hawks in Saturday's Game 3.



Atlanta did a better job responding to adversity Monday, but still not good enough.



Delfino went 6 for 8 from 3-point range, including a 3-pointer from the corner to put Milwaukee ahead 97-88 with 3:56 left. Smith missed inside and Jennings grabbed the rebound, then hit a floating jumper at the other end.



Layups by Al Horford and Johnson later cut the lead to five with 1:41 remaining, but Milwaukee's Kurt Thomas made one of two free throws, then took a charge by Crawford with 1:20 left.








“Am I a nice guy all the time?” Zee said one recent evening in New York. “No. I certainly did not get to where I got to by being a really nice pushover. I am very opinionated. I have a very specific vision of how things can be, but I'm also fair. I don't think there's any need to be rude for no reason.”


Zee attempted to convey his diplomatic nature in last season's finale, where he sat judge-like behind his desk while the contentious duo traded blame and insults. Kaplan gave Zee a melodramatic “It’s her or me” ultimatum before storming off, though it’s clear both girls will be back for more this season. It's all for the cameras, after all. “I can tell you that Erin and Olivia do not sit around thinking about each other all day,” Zee said.


“If Joe and I agreed on Olivia, there would be no show,” said Kaplan. “I think we both take it with a grain of salt.”


“I think Twitter's fun. Let's face it, no one's interested if I'm going to the gym but people care if I'm at a photo shoot and tweet about this cool new shoe I love,” said Zee.


Zee considers the drama that ensues par for the course when starring in a docusoap, but the 41-year-old Toronto native would rather shift his focus to lifting the curtain behind the machinations of a fashion magazine. According to Zee, The City’s new season will include a closer look at him on the job. There will be more photo shoots, meetings with fashion designers and a work-related trip to Los Angeles. Elle Editor-in-Chief Robbie Myers even appears in the show’s previews, which could open opportunities to show the inevitable power struggle between the magazine's two top editors. With Zee's star on the rise, the addition of Myers—who had been almost nonexistent in Elle's two other forays into TV, Project Runway and Stylista—could give Palermo's and Kaplan's workplace tension a run for its money.






Saturday 24 April 2010

Let's Make Money


LET'S MAKE MONEY by foto4berlin.de

click here to learn more about making money online



UPDATE: Note the environment Cameron’s in when he’s lashed out at conservative “Avatar” critics:



  • According to the Hollywood Reporter Cameron called Beck a f–king a–hole “surrounded by journalists inside a West Hollywood hillside mansion.”

  • Last month Cameron took on his right-wing critics in a Hollywood Cafe while being interviewed by an L.A. Times reporter.

  • In January the Malibu Mansion Dweller gave us hell from the Arclight Theatre at a screening for Hollywood Insiders.


Interesting. And with that I end the update.


Uh, oh, James Cameron’s angry and you know how James gets when he’s angry… Stupid:


“Glenn Beck is a f—ing a–hole,” he said, according to The Associated Press. “I’ve met him. He called me the Antichrist, and not about ‘Avatar.’ He hadn’t even seen ‘Avatar’ yet. I don’t know if he has seen it.” …


“I want to call those deniers out into the street at high noon and shoot it out with those boneheads,” Cameron said. “Anybody that is a global-warming denier at this point in time has got their head so deeply up their a–, I’m not sure they could hear me.”


Cameron said conservative criticism of the environmental message of “Avatar” aren’t necessarily attacks. “They’re just people ranting away, lost in their little bubbles of reality, steeped in their own hatred, their own fear and hatred,” he said. “That’s where it all comes from. Let’s just call it out. Let’s have a public discussion. That’s what movies are supposed to do, you know. You can have a mindless entertainment film that doesn’t affect anybody. I wasn’t interested in that.”


My first question for Mr. Global Warming would be to ask why a mansion-dweller so concerned with the welfare of the planet would initially release ”Avatar” on DVD and Blu-ray with no extras whatsoever.


Here’s what a cynical charlatan James Cameron is. The first “Avatar” DVD release occurs on Earth Day to take full advantage of all his Stupakky fans who want to feel good about themselves without actually doing anything to further their cause. But it’s a barebones release. This way Cameron can make a whole lot more money in the future releasing the same film again and again in Special Editions, Deluxe Editions, Platinum Editions and so on.


Does this sound like someone who gives a hi-ho hearty damn about Mother Earth? No, this sounds like just another greedy capitalist wringing every possible nickel from his wares by finessing the market in a way that promotes as much consuming as possible of a product that, by the way, comes in a thick plastic case that must have a landfill half-life of a couple thousand years.


For the record, I have a tremendous amount of affection for greedy capitalists who wring every dime out of their product.


It’s lying hypocrites who slander the military I can’t abide.


James Cameron doesn’t believe the planet’s in trouble. If he did, he would live and behave differently. And if he does, his behavior is a form of genocide. He’s intentionally conducting his life and business in a  way that will kill us all. (Who’s the f–king a–hole now?)


If Beck calls Cameron’s bluff (pretty please, Glenn), I’d bet all kinds of money Cameron locks himself in his air conditioned mansion and refuses to come out.



I don’t mean to pick on Fred Wilson. It’s just that of all that I found notable in Doree Shafrir’s cover story in this week’s New York Magazine, “Tweet Tweet Boom Boom: How Tech Startups Like Foursquare and Meetup Are Trying to Overthrow Old Media and Build a Better New York” — and there was a lot! — I found this quote most illuminating:



“We have a two-year program here, and we try like hell to hire women into that program,” says Union Square Ventures’ Wilson (whose office, except for his assistant, is all male). “We tell the world we’ve got this opening, and anybody who’s interested can apply, and it’s 90 percent men who even bother to apply. I mean, I don’t know what the problem is.”



Imagine for a moment that Fred Wilson just gave a start-up a big chunk of money, and a goal. If that goal was 90% a failure, do you think it would be enough if they were just “trying like hell?” If you “don’t know what the problem is,” you tackle it and find out. Fred Wilson knows that, it’s how every single startup is born. But that problem has to first be a priority.


As for “telling the world” — well, it depends how you define “world.” Wilson has advertised it in his popular wee-hours email (see here and here) and on the Union Square Ventures blog (see here and here), but that seems only to be telling his world. And if that world reaches 90% men and you’re trying to bring in women, then maybe a different solution is required. To paraphrase Foursquare co-founder Dennis Crowley: “To make a foosball table smarter isn’t that different from ‘Let’s make a VC smarter.’ ”


There is a lot to this article — including some friends of mine! — so pardon me for focusing on the demographics first. As Joe Coscarelli pointed out yesterday at the Village Voice, “It’s a boy’s world, still: of the 53 entrepreneurs photographed, only 6 are women.” Sigh. Those odds not only suck, but they don’t reflect my own experience in this milieu — who I see at events, at SXSW, at Tom & Jerry’s. (12% doesn’t even reflect the audience at a New York Tech Meetup, at least in my experience. Though if you’re a single guy on the prowl, you may want to try elsewhere.) These companies don’t run themselves and so many of the crucial team members are women — not necessarily founders, but their right arms and guts and blood — who are integral to strategy and growth and implementation. I’m not saying it would be 26.5 out of 53, but more than 6? It would have to be. Even if you just want to attempt to approximate the ratio in the actual industry.


But Wilson is talking about the people at the top, and I guess NYmag is, too. Paging through the online gallery, I looked for the pic featuring Drop.io, knowing that they’d recently hired Soraya Darabi, an SAI 100 designee and well-known new media/tech industry maven. I know she’s there providing crucial support in the background, but you’d never know it from the pic, featuring three guys. (Sidebar: Apparently being a young tech entrepreneur in New York City also means being photographed upside down.) And of course, more women were mentioned in the article than were shot — Emily Gannett of KlickableTV, Brooke Moreland of Fashism.com, Alexis Maybank and Alexandra Wilkis Wilson of Gilt Groupe — all which launched before 2010, unlike a number of those photographed.


So: If only 6 out of 53 featured NYC tech superstars are women, then are we using the wrong criteria? And by “we” I mean the royal we – we the media, in the criteria we are using to assess “success,” and in how we the industry are looking to galvanize, recruit and train. I would venture to say yes — below the surface (or, at least according to the average Foursquare leaderboard) there is a robust presence of women — more than 12%, at least! — making things happen and contributing to the whole. If the data is there, and the resources are there, then all that remains is to do something about it. If we can make a foosball table smarter, than surely we can do that.


Tweet Tweet Boom Boom [New York]


Photographs from NYMag.com by Jake Chessum.


Follow us on Twitter.


Sign up for Mediaite’s daily newsletter.


Friday 23 April 2010

Let's Make Money


Let's make money by Ju. C.

click here to learn more about making money online



UPDATE: Note the environment Cameron’s in when he’s lashed out at conservative “Avatar” critics:



  • According to the Hollywood Reporter Cameron called Beck a f–king a–hole “surrounded by journalists inside a West Hollywood hillside mansion.”

  • Last month Cameron took on his right-wing critics in a Hollywood Cafe while being interviewed by an L.A. Times reporter.

  • In January the Malibu Mansion Dweller gave us hell from the Arclight Theatre at a screening for Hollywood Insiders.


Interesting. And with that I end the update.


Uh, oh, James Cameron’s angry and you know how James gets when he’s angry… Stupid:


“Glenn Beck is a f—ing a–hole,” he said, according to The Associated Press. “I’ve met him. He called me the Antichrist, and not about ‘Avatar.’ He hadn’t even seen ‘Avatar’ yet. I don’t know if he has seen it.” …


“I want to call those deniers out into the street at high noon and shoot it out with those boneheads,” Cameron said. “Anybody that is a global-warming denier at this point in time has got their head so deeply up their a–, I’m not sure they could hear me.”


Cameron said conservative criticism of the environmental message of “Avatar” aren’t necessarily attacks. “They’re just people ranting away, lost in their little bubbles of reality, steeped in their own hatred, their own fear and hatred,” he said. “That’s where it all comes from. Let’s just call it out. Let’s have a public discussion. That’s what movies are supposed to do, you know. You can have a mindless entertainment film that doesn’t affect anybody. I wasn’t interested in that.”


My first question for Mr. Global Warming would be to ask why a mansion-dweller so concerned with the welfare of the planet would initially release ”Avatar” on DVD and Blu-ray with no extras whatsoever.


Here’s what a cynical charlatan James Cameron is. The first “Avatar” DVD release occurs on Earth Day to take full advantage of all his Stupakky fans who want to feel good about themselves without actually doing anything to further their cause. But it’s a barebones release. This way Cameron can make a whole lot more money in the future releasing the same film again and again in Special Editions, Deluxe Editions, Platinum Editions and so on.


Does this sound like someone who gives a hi-ho hearty damn about Mother Earth? No, this sounds like just another greedy capitalist wringing every possible nickel from his wares by finessing the market in a way that promotes as much consuming as possible of a product that, by the way, comes in a thick plastic case that must have a landfill half-life of a couple thousand years.


For the record, I have a tremendous amount of affection for greedy capitalists who wring every dime out of their product.


It’s lying hypocrites who slander the military I can’t abide.


James Cameron doesn’t believe the planet’s in trouble. If he did, he would live and behave differently. And if he does, his behavior is a form of genocide. He’s intentionally conducting his life and business in a  way that will kill us all. (Who’s the f–king a–hole now?)


If Beck calls Cameron’s bluff (pretty please, Glenn), I’d bet all kinds of money Cameron locks himself in his air conditioned mansion and refuses to come out.



Thursday, April 22, 2010


Democratic Solutions? Republican Solutions? Let�s Have Both.    [Andrew Redleaf & Richard Vigilante]

To the extent one believes that regulators can actually get a firm grasp on what the megabanks are doing, what they own, and what they owe, or reliably distinguish risky and reckless practices from safe and sound ones, the president’s vision — the vision espoused in the Dodd/Frank bill — has a chance of succeeding. We certainly don’t want to get in the way of his trying. By all means, give the regulators the tools they ask for and let them do their best.

It’s just that there is so very little evidence that they can succeed. The glaring and disheartening truth is that the regulators endorsed every one, and required some, of the practices that led to the crisis. Even the staggering complex mortgage-backed securities at the heart of the crisis, with their bogus AAA ratings (conveyed by government-regulated ratings agencies), were produced in such huge volume largely because the regulators had blessed them as the safest of all possible bank investments short of U.S. Treasuries.

Still, some version of the Dodd/Frank bill will become law within weeks or days. Republicans should not obstruct that effort. On the contrary, they should offer their full support. Better regulation is one possible answer to the problem. But in return, Republicans should ask for one little thing.

The Democrats want better regulators. That’s a Democrat thing. Republicans should want better markets. That’s our thing. And they way to get better markets is to give them better information. Markets failed two years ago because for many years, markets were denied the information they needed to make good decisions, to separate good mortgages from bad, good banks from bad, and shift capital accordingly.

For too long, American banks have operated in the shadows, their inner workings hidden not from regulators (who have an invincible legal right to examine every line in the banks’ books) but from citizens and investors. That’s why we have proposed the one truly radical reform that would have prevented the both the mortgage crisis and the crash and would do far more to prevent future catastrophes: Require every significant financial institution in U.S., every firm managing other people’s money, to disclose every investment position, every asset, and every liability every week, between market close on Friday and market open on Monday morning.

We don’t mean mere accountants’ summaries. We mean the raw data. Every stock, every bond, every long, every short, every hedge, every swap. All of it. Collectively millions and millions of lines of data.

At first it would be too much data even to be useful. But as the short sellers and curmudgeons, the rag-and-bone shops of the financial world, gradually absorbed the data and constituted massive parallel-processing systems over months and years, we bet the result would be an early-warning system that would run rings around the regulators and do far more to keep the banks on the straight and narrow than any grand high council or regulatory poo-bahs.

We say not one word against the grand high council. Let them commence their duties this minute. But let’s give them some help. Let’s back up dozens, nay hundreds, of regulators with millions of citizen investors. Let’s build redundancy into the system. In the end, letting our fellow citizens back into the game is the best protection we can have.

— Andrew Redleaf and Richard Vigilante are respectively CEO and communications director of Whitebox Advisors. They blog at www.capitalismbetrayed.com.

Wednesday 21 April 2010

The inner Circle


Inner Circle on stage. Being praised by the fans. by Shutter Labs Photography

skip over to Make Money Not Excuses



In a March 21 interview, Kelly Tilghman of The Golf Channel asked Tiger Woods about media reports that indicated members of his “inner circle” knew of “misdoings“.



Woods:


That is not true, it was all me. I’m the one who did it, I’m the one who acted the way I acted, no one knew what was going on. I’m sure if more people would have known in my inner circle they would’ve, they would’ve stopped it…or tried to put a stop to it but I kept it all to myself.


Larry Dorman of the NEW YORK TIMES follows up with Woods about that statement, which based on hard evidence presented by alleged Woods mistresses, appears to be untrue.


In a statement to Dorman, Woods said:


“No one is responsible for my behavior but me. Even though there were times when I deceived various people in my organization, most were simply told little to nothing and kept in the dark. Obviously, I did this to avoid owning up to my actions. I expressed regret for that manipulation because the fault is mine alone and so is the blame.”


So is Woods now intimating that members of his “inner circle” may have unwittingly aided in the execution of his extramarital affairs?


Yes.


It isn’t impossible to believe that Woods childhood friend and president of his golf course design company Bryon Bell didn’t realize what he was doing when he  allegedly booked flights, hotel rooms and other logistics for Josyln James and Rachel Uchitel to meet Woods on the road. (And in the case of Uchitel, actually fly with her to Australia.)


But considering the closeness of Bell’s relationship to Woods, the golfer was to be Bell’s best man at his wedding recently, it is impossible to believe that Bell wouldn’t have at least suspected that an extramarital affair might be going on.


If I was Woods and I actually believed Bell never suspected anything, I’d be rather worried about Bell’s soundness of mind and ability to operate a golf course design company that generates millions for me annually.



I bring up Bell first, over Woods agent Mark Steinberg and caddy Steve Williams, because we have verifiable documents that point to his involvement in setting up the logistics of alleged affairs. Though Steinberg is linked to the alleged deal to prevent a National Enquirer expose about a Woods affair by brokering an interview of Woods with Muscle & Fitness, both properties of American media. (American Media has denied that happened.)


Joslyn James also recently said in an interview that Williams was “aware” of her and knew of the “dynamic” of their relationship.


Williams has repeatedly denied knowledge of Woods affairs, but Steinberg and Bell have said nothing - despite numerous inquiries from the media.


In a perverse sort of way, I admire the relentless defense Woods is providing for his friends and business associates. Though I doubt Woods wife Elin Nordegren is nearly as excited about his unbending loyalty to those who, in my opinion, had to have known that something wasn’t quite right.


Also from Brooks this week:


Greek Pole Vaulter gives Greece’s Dancing With The Stars a lift:



Soccer player blows a boog, wipes it on Olympic hero Lindsey Vonn:



 The secret Tweet life of pro athletes and their groupies on Twitter:



March Madness is going to 96 teams?! What could’ve prevented it.


More from Brooks on Twitter, updated round-the-clock every single day.



Learn more about SPORTSbyBROOKS, the original and most-read independent sports blog. (Since 2001!)






He probably regretted not just having him killed, though, when he had to bail his father out of jail. Word got back to Ellen’s reporter friend with benefits. That, of course, made Tom’s plan possible.

Tom redeems himself

It’s not clear to me how far back Tom has been plotting. I venture to say that he saw the error of his ways after realizing Ellen took the fall for his mistake in approaching Tessa against Patty’s orders. Nevertheless, he made up for it this week.

After leaking his connection to the Tobin Ponzi scheme himself, Tom publicly resigned from the firm. That allowed him to contact Leonard when he too was cast out from the Tobins after Ellen informed Joe of Leonard’s carpet-bagging past. With no one else to turn to, Leonard strikes a deal for immunity with Tom (via Ellen’s district attorney connections), a deal which I'm not sure is really happening, and agrees to get him back some of his money.

Tom, cast out by his wife as well, takes up residence in one of Leonard’s apartments where the homeless man finds him. By the way, how did he get into the apartment? Will he have something to do with killing Tom? Like I said, no one is what he or she seems right now.

Patty is fooled
It doesn’t happen much, but Patty hasn’t been as astute as we’re used to. She’s borderline schizophrenic with that crazy horse showing up outside her dreams now. She seems indecisive, such as in the firing of the new associate Alex in the last episode. We also see her on the verge of giving up on the case before Ellen gives her a rousing pep talk. She’s not exactly at the top of her game right now. In fact, she was totally clueless about Tom’s plan and her son’s girlfriend’s deception after Patty paid her off to leave. I do have faith that Patty will pull it all together in the finale, but we already know she’ll lose another person from her inner circle before this is all over. How will that affect her already unstable being?

So, it’s that time now: What are your predictions for the finale? How does Tom die? How will Patty recover the Tobin cash? And, why has the show returned to the conspiracy surrounding Ellen’s fiancĂ©’s death?

-- Jethro Nededog (Follow me on Twitter @TheRealJethro)


RELATED:


'Damages': When family is relative

'Damages': Will DirecTV save the struggling show?

'Damages': Knee deep in this mess



All 'Damages' coverage on Show Tracker

Photo: Tate Donovan in “Damages” on FX. Credit: Craig Blankenhorn / FX


click here to learn about making money

can we make money?

Yes We Can!

Imagine making more money in a month than most people earn in a whole year. Imagine generating a monthly residual income of thousands of dollars per month, after month, after month, after month. Imagine true financial freedom.

take a look at a website i found: http://blog.pro2sell.com


Make War and Hunger History-00004 by Social Geographic


If you, like me, will be scrambling to complete your taxes this weekend, and feeling a bit disgruntled about being taxed more than the big boys on Wall Street, Jobs with Justice has a great plan on how to work out your angst.



Jobs with Justice, the feisty union representing workers in 25 states, is calling for a Tax Wall Street Day of Action on April 15th.



"Big banks helped plunge the nation into the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. They lobbied for deregulation and corporate tax breaks, then went on a reckless gambling spree, creating complicated, risky mechanisms to make profits off of destabilizing the economy. They have tightened lending for consumers and small business, and they have refused to modify home mortgages. Millions of Americans have lost their homes, their jobs and their retirement savings," says a Jobs with Justice flyer.


Indeed, Americans have lost $14 trillion in wages, savings and housing wealth since the start of the financial crisis. According to the Center for Media and Democracy's Wall Street Bailout Cost Table, we are still $2 trillion in the hole for the bailout, plus we read with astonishment that the bailout enabled Wall Street to pay out $140 billion in bonuses in 2009 to top executives. With tax lawyers and accountants up the wazoo, big bankers know how to dodge taxes on their earnings and bonuses leaving middle class Americans holding the bag.



The solution? It's time to take it back.



Jobs with Justice, SEIU, AFL-CIO and the broad coalition Americans for Financial Reform are all calling for a teeny tiny Bankster tax, 0.20 percent, on the sale or purchase of a share of stock, bonds or derivatives, which would would help us to recoup our losses and put the money to work rebuilding America. The idea is supported by Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz as a way of dampening high-speed, high-stakes gambling on Wall Street and raising a steady stream of revenue. It was even touted at one time by President Obama's chief economic adviser Larry Summers. A bill has been introduced in Congress recently by Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Oregon) and Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) that uses the revenue to create jobs and reduce the deficit.



"Champagne, caviar, tell us where our good jobs are!"



You too can join the fun. Take action on April 15th at a local branch of a big national (bailed out) bank like Bank of America, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo or Goldman Sachs. Get an easy to use action kit and learn more by visiting the Jobs with Justice site.



"Hey Wall Street, its not fair, it's time for you to pay your share!"











For new readers, I'm a laid off teacher looking for input and stories of others around the nation that I can share on my blogs. This article contains most of my post originally written on March 15th, but worth sharing on Huffington Post as well.



I received an email from my friend Josh. Josh and I went to college together, and have had similar career paths. We both started teaching at inner city schools in Milwaukee, WI and our current jobs both serve large populations of low income students, though I have since left Wisconsin. He currently teaches at Milwaukee Montessori IB High School, a school which he helped open, and is now a part of the team of leaders there as well as a classroom history teacher. His successes in education make me proud to be his friend. In fact, his school was recently the subject of a positive article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He is the type of person who will always have a discussion with you about education, but most likely the discussion will also include the word "reform".



He wrote me this:



"I have crafted a new theory recently while wondering, where did all of the money go?

I started with the realization that the political right has only made two significant contributions to the education discussion in the past two decades: choice schools (private schools that receive public funding) and No Child Left Behind. As the Left has spent the past decades creating and studying different educational models: project-based learning, differentiated instruction, constructivism, the Montessori approach, direct instruction, integrated curriculum through regular public and charter schools (public schools with greater autonomy over curriculum and instruction in exchange from greater accountability for results).

How does NCLB affect the funding of public schools?



Slowly, over the last decade, money has been siphoned from local districts to buy and expand the testing services from the test companies. Then the local districts need to buy the new text books aligned to the new tests, and hire the consultants (who always seem to be Texans) that will help the schools teach the kids the skills to pass the new tests. In Wisconsin in 2009, the Department of Public Instruction declared that the tests did not accurately reflect what the kids know, and since it took six to nine months to get the results, it was too late to do anything about the findings anyway. A new test is being developed, but it will not be ready for three to five years. Sounds like a pretty nice contract for the testing company who develop the new tests, as well as the consulting firm who facilitate the process. Wait, and then the entire state will have to buy all new text books from a company in Texas to allow the kiddies to learn algebra in a new way so that it can be reflected on the new test. Looks like another round of consultants will have to be brought in to teach the teachers how to teach the new textbooks so the kids do well on the new tests.



Even more laughable is Illinois's version of the high school test, the ACT. Illinois uses a college entrance standardized test to assess the quality of the state's high schools. To my knowledge, Illinois high schools are tasked to teach the state standards of education, not the content of the ACT. This would be like assessing the effectiveness of a driving school with a boater's safety exam. Sort of related, but not the material taught or applicable to all participants. I cannot wait to read about the contracts to redesign Illinois's testing system. So, No Child Left Behind is an unfunded mandate for continuous improvement, which requires significant funding from local districts to the Testing Industry, the Textbook Industry, and the Educational Consultant Industry.



Tom, I guarantee you can find a job in one of those three industries because they are always hiring and always expanding. And, I hear Texas is beautiful this time of year."



Ah, Josh, never one to shy away from an opinion. He makes some valid points (though I don't want this blog to become a conversation on politics -- if you are laid off, you are laid off whether Democrat or Republican, and the fact is while I sit jobless for next year, I haven't heard any politician offer anything other than garbage talking points about what we "need to do" instead of actually doing something). It bothers me that there isn't more investigative journalism into how much money states actually spend on standardized tests. There are a lot of people that are getting rich on public education, and just the fact that I had to write that statement makes me disgusted by how wrong it is.



At least it looks like NCLB is on the way out the door. I'm going to dedicate a later blog post to this article.



Thanks for sharing your opinion, Josh. I look forward to more people sharing their views with me so that I can post them on this blog.